When performance and cost matter, Harper’s fused‑stack outperforms Heroku’s multi‑service architecture by orders of magnitude—at a fraction of the price
When performance and cost matter, Harper’s fused‑stack outperforms Heroku’s multi‑service architecture by orders of magnitude—at a fraction of the price
When performance and cost matter, Harper’s fused‑stack outperforms Heroku’s multi‑service architecture by orders of magnitude—at a fraction of the price
When performance and cost matter, Harper’s fused‑stack outperforms Heroku’s multi‑service architecture by orders of magnitude—at a fraction of the price
Explore how Harper brings search, embeddings, model access, and controlled AI decisions into one runtime, reducing the services around your AI application.
Most real-time apps need a broker, a bridge, and a cache to keep state in sync. This is a live MQTT scoring demo on Harper, where the topic and the database record are the same write.
Cross-region latency comes from distance, not slow queries. Why centralized data paths cost you latency, uptime, and money, with a benchmark you can run.
InfoQ examines benchmark results comparing co-located and serverless architectures, highlighting faster personalized-data paths, serverless advantages under heavy fan-out, and the performance implications of eliminating network hops between services at scale.
Harper 5.2 attacks database performance on three fronts: a per-worker record cache validated through lock-free atomic version slots, isolated commit scheduling to keep database writes off the application thread, and query planner improvements that route through the shortest available data path.
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
%20(1).png){kind=icon}