Click Below to Get the Code

Browse, clone, and build from real-world templates powered by Harper.
Blog
GitHub Logo

The Cost of Serialization and 5 Ways to Minimize or Remove This Hidden Expense

While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required.
Blog

The Cost of Serialization and 5 Ways to Minimize or Remove This Hidden Expense

Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM
at Harper
May 31, 2024
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM
at Harper
May 31, 2024
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM
at Harper
May 31, 2024
May 31, 2024
While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required.
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM

In today's data-driven world, serialization plays a crucial role in ensuring data integrity and traceability across various industries. But beyond the initial software or hardware costs, there's a hidden iceberg of expenses that can significantly impact your bottom line. This article dives deep into the true cost of serialization and explores strategies to minimize these expenses.

The Value of Serialization & Deserialization

Data serialization and deserialization are fundamental concepts in programming/computer science that deal with converting complex data structures into transferable and storable data formats. Here's a breakdown:

Serialization:

Serialization is the process of converting an object's state to a byte stream. Imagine you have a well-organized desk with folders, notebooks, and pens (representing your program's data structures like objects). Serialization is the process of taking all that organized stuff on your desk and carefully packing it into a box (like a byte stream) for easy storage or transport. This box can be stored in a file, sent over a network, or saved for later use. Essentially:

  • The program breaks down the data structure (your desk) into its basic building blocks (like variables and their values).
  • These building blocks are then converted into a format that can be easily understood by different systems (like packing your notes and pens into a format suitable for shipping).
  • This format is often a standardized format like JSON, XML, CSV, or a custom binary data format.

For example, you may have heard of Protocol Buffers, which are language and platform neutral mechanisms for serializing structured data.

Deserialization:

Once you have your box (serialized data) and want to use the stuff inside again, deserialization comes into play. It's like unpacking the box and neatly arranging everything back on your desk: 

  • It takes the serialized object (the box) and interprets the format it's in.
  • It then uses that information to recreate the original data structure (your desk) in memory.
  • This allows your program to work with the data again, just as it was before it was serialized.

Benefits of Serialization and Deserialization

  • Data Persistence: Store program data (like user settings or game progress) in a file for later use.
  • Data Transmission: Efficiently send complex data structures between programs or devices.
  • Data Sharing: Facilitate sharing data in a standardized format across different systems.

In essence, serialization and deserialization are like packing and unpacking your data, making it transferable and storable while maintaining its integrity and functionality.

Minimizing the Costs of Serialization

The process of serialization, while essential for tasks like data persistence and transmission across networks, can introduce significant hidden costs that erode performance and inflate operational expenses. Serialization overhead stems from two primary factors: marshaling and unmarshalling. Marshaling refers to the process of converting an object's state into a byte stream while unmarshalling reverses this process, recreating the original object from the serialized data. Both marshaling and unmarshalling require CPU cycles and can become bottlenecks in high-throughput systems.

5 Strategies to Reduce Serialization Overhead:

  1. Choose Efficient Formats: While formats like JSON and XML are popular, they can be verbose and inefficient for data transfer. Consider alternative formats like Protocol Buffers, Apache Thrift, or MessagePack. These offer a compact binary representation that reduces the amount of data transmitted and processed during serialization/deserialization, leading to significant performance gains. Compare data serialization formats here.
  2. Data Minimization: The more data you serialize, the greater the overhead. Analyze your data and identify unnecessary fields that can be excluded during serialization. This reduces the data footprint and streamlines the process. 
  3. Lazy Loading: Don't serialize entire objects at once, especially if you only need specific fields. Implement lazy loading mechanisms to serialize data only when it's required, minimizing unnecessary processing.
  4. Code Generation: Many serialization libraries offer code generation tools. These tools can automatically generate optimized code for serialization and deserialization tasks, reducing runtime overhead.
  5. Deliver Services with an ITS or DSP: Integrated Technology Systems (ITSs) and their high-scale big brother, the Distributed Systems Platform (DSP), work by unifying backend components—databases, application servers, caching systems, and streaming services—into a single technology. This approach reduces serialization by reducing the need to transport information between various systems in order to deliver a response to a client. DSPs are very similar to ITSs with one critical difference, DSPs are able to synchronize data between geo-distributed nodes in real-time, allowing for low-latency global service fabrics to be created.

How an ITS and DSP Remove Serialization

Imagine a bustling city with information flowing freely between buildings. Like busy citizens, data packets zip between offices (services) carrying crucial information. But there's a catch: every time they go between builds, they go through a lengthy security and packing process, packing their documents (serialization) and then unpacking them upon arrival (deserialization). This bureaucratic nightmare slows everyone down, creating bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

Now, what if there was a solution? What if instead of requiring people to secure, package, and un-package information several times to complete a single task, they only needed to go through this process upon entry to the city? This is essentially what an ITS and DSP achieves. Data packets are translated upon entry, allowing citizens to perform tasks freely until the information is packaged as a response to the client. This not only cuts down on paperwork (processing overhead) but also allows for a smoother flow of information, significantly improving the city's (system's) overall efficiency.

The Power of a Single Serialization Per Response

A key advantage of leveraging an ITS for serialization lies in its ability to perform the process only once. Unlike traditional architectures where data might be serialized and deserialized multiple times (for example, consider a client-Apollo-API-database loop), an ITS can handle all processes internally. This significantly reduces the overhead of repeated marshaling and unmarshalling, leading to substantial performance gains.

CPU Cycles and Cost Implications

As we've discussed, serialization and deserialization are CPU-intensive tasks. Each time data is converted to a transferable format, and back, it consumes processing power. In high-throughput systems, these repeated cycles can become bottlenecks, limiting the system's overall capacity and driving up operational costs. However, by leveraging an ITS to minimize serialization events, you can significantly reduce the CPU usage associated with data processing. This translates to tangible cost savings and improved resource utilization, making a compelling case for adopting an ITS or DSP.

Latency and Throughput

Serialization and deserialization add latency to data processing. Each additional step in the data flow introduces a delay, which can accumulate and negatively impact your system's overall responsiveness. This becomes especially critical in real-time applications, where low latency is paramount. An ITS's ability to handle full-stack processes with a single technology allows your system to respond to each request faster and thus handle higher request volumes, ultimately increasing throughput per unit of RAM.

Choosing the Best Route for Serialization Reduction

While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. 

To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required. These technologies present a powerful, systemic solution for applications heavily reliant on data movement. However, ITSs and DSPs also require more significant structural change to how services operate and are thus are best coupled with new service creation or re-building existing services that are failing to meet requirements. 

For applications demanding peak performance, cost-effectiveness, and high scale, carefully evaluating the role a DSP can play is a must. This innovative new service delivery approach can be a game-changer, enabling you to achieve the optimal balance between data integrity, transferability, and cost for your high-throughput services.

Ready to explore the possibilities? Reach out to our Distributed Systems Architect at hello@harperdb.io.

In today's data-driven world, serialization plays a crucial role in ensuring data integrity and traceability across various industries. But beyond the initial software or hardware costs, there's a hidden iceberg of expenses that can significantly impact your bottom line. This article dives deep into the true cost of serialization and explores strategies to minimize these expenses.

The Value of Serialization & Deserialization

Data serialization and deserialization are fundamental concepts in programming/computer science that deal with converting complex data structures into transferable and storable data formats. Here's a breakdown:

Serialization:

Serialization is the process of converting an object's state to a byte stream. Imagine you have a well-organized desk with folders, notebooks, and pens (representing your program's data structures like objects). Serialization is the process of taking all that organized stuff on your desk and carefully packing it into a box (like a byte stream) for easy storage or transport. This box can be stored in a file, sent over a network, or saved for later use. Essentially:

  • The program breaks down the data structure (your desk) into its basic building blocks (like variables and their values).
  • These building blocks are then converted into a format that can be easily understood by different systems (like packing your notes and pens into a format suitable for shipping).
  • This format is often a standardized format like JSON, XML, CSV, or a custom binary data format.

For example, you may have heard of Protocol Buffers, which are language and platform neutral mechanisms for serializing structured data.

Deserialization:

Once you have your box (serialized data) and want to use the stuff inside again, deserialization comes into play. It's like unpacking the box and neatly arranging everything back on your desk: 

  • It takes the serialized object (the box) and interprets the format it's in.
  • It then uses that information to recreate the original data structure (your desk) in memory.
  • This allows your program to work with the data again, just as it was before it was serialized.

Benefits of Serialization and Deserialization

  • Data Persistence: Store program data (like user settings or game progress) in a file for later use.
  • Data Transmission: Efficiently send complex data structures between programs or devices.
  • Data Sharing: Facilitate sharing data in a standardized format across different systems.

In essence, serialization and deserialization are like packing and unpacking your data, making it transferable and storable while maintaining its integrity and functionality.

Minimizing the Costs of Serialization

The process of serialization, while essential for tasks like data persistence and transmission across networks, can introduce significant hidden costs that erode performance and inflate operational expenses. Serialization overhead stems from two primary factors: marshaling and unmarshalling. Marshaling refers to the process of converting an object's state into a byte stream while unmarshalling reverses this process, recreating the original object from the serialized data. Both marshaling and unmarshalling require CPU cycles and can become bottlenecks in high-throughput systems.

5 Strategies to Reduce Serialization Overhead:

  1. Choose Efficient Formats: While formats like JSON and XML are popular, they can be verbose and inefficient for data transfer. Consider alternative formats like Protocol Buffers, Apache Thrift, or MessagePack. These offer a compact binary representation that reduces the amount of data transmitted and processed during serialization/deserialization, leading to significant performance gains. Compare data serialization formats here.
  2. Data Minimization: The more data you serialize, the greater the overhead. Analyze your data and identify unnecessary fields that can be excluded during serialization. This reduces the data footprint and streamlines the process. 
  3. Lazy Loading: Don't serialize entire objects at once, especially if you only need specific fields. Implement lazy loading mechanisms to serialize data only when it's required, minimizing unnecessary processing.
  4. Code Generation: Many serialization libraries offer code generation tools. These tools can automatically generate optimized code for serialization and deserialization tasks, reducing runtime overhead.
  5. Deliver Services with an ITS or DSP: Integrated Technology Systems (ITSs) and their high-scale big brother, the Distributed Systems Platform (DSP), work by unifying backend components—databases, application servers, caching systems, and streaming services—into a single technology. This approach reduces serialization by reducing the need to transport information between various systems in order to deliver a response to a client. DSPs are very similar to ITSs with one critical difference, DSPs are able to synchronize data between geo-distributed nodes in real-time, allowing for low-latency global service fabrics to be created.

How an ITS and DSP Remove Serialization

Imagine a bustling city with information flowing freely between buildings. Like busy citizens, data packets zip between offices (services) carrying crucial information. But there's a catch: every time they go between builds, they go through a lengthy security and packing process, packing their documents (serialization) and then unpacking them upon arrival (deserialization). This bureaucratic nightmare slows everyone down, creating bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

Now, what if there was a solution? What if instead of requiring people to secure, package, and un-package information several times to complete a single task, they only needed to go through this process upon entry to the city? This is essentially what an ITS and DSP achieves. Data packets are translated upon entry, allowing citizens to perform tasks freely until the information is packaged as a response to the client. This not only cuts down on paperwork (processing overhead) but also allows for a smoother flow of information, significantly improving the city's (system's) overall efficiency.

The Power of a Single Serialization Per Response

A key advantage of leveraging an ITS for serialization lies in its ability to perform the process only once. Unlike traditional architectures where data might be serialized and deserialized multiple times (for example, consider a client-Apollo-API-database loop), an ITS can handle all processes internally. This significantly reduces the overhead of repeated marshaling and unmarshalling, leading to substantial performance gains.

CPU Cycles and Cost Implications

As we've discussed, serialization and deserialization are CPU-intensive tasks. Each time data is converted to a transferable format, and back, it consumes processing power. In high-throughput systems, these repeated cycles can become bottlenecks, limiting the system's overall capacity and driving up operational costs. However, by leveraging an ITS to minimize serialization events, you can significantly reduce the CPU usage associated with data processing. This translates to tangible cost savings and improved resource utilization, making a compelling case for adopting an ITS or DSP.

Latency and Throughput

Serialization and deserialization add latency to data processing. Each additional step in the data flow introduces a delay, which can accumulate and negatively impact your system's overall responsiveness. This becomes especially critical in real-time applications, where low latency is paramount. An ITS's ability to handle full-stack processes with a single technology allows your system to respond to each request faster and thus handle higher request volumes, ultimately increasing throughput per unit of RAM.

Choosing the Best Route for Serialization Reduction

While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. 

To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required. These technologies present a powerful, systemic solution for applications heavily reliant on data movement. However, ITSs and DSPs also require more significant structural change to how services operate and are thus are best coupled with new service creation or re-building existing services that are failing to meet requirements. 

For applications demanding peak performance, cost-effectiveness, and high scale, carefully evaluating the role a DSP can play is a must. This innovative new service delivery approach can be a game-changer, enabling you to achieve the optimal balance between data integrity, transferability, and cost for your high-throughput services.

Ready to explore the possibilities? Reach out to our Distributed Systems Architect at hello@harperdb.io.

While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required.

Download

White arrow pointing right
While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required.

Download

White arrow pointing right
While efficient formats, data minimization, and other techniques play crucial roles in minimizing serialization costs, they cannot completely remove serialization steps. To remove serialization steps, an Integrated Technology System or Distributed Systems Platform is required.

Download

White arrow pointing right

Explore Recent Resources

Blog
GitHub Logo

5 Architectures for Web Personalization

Personalization is a data-delivery problem. Every architectural choice reduces to two distances: compute to user, and compute to fresh data. This piece maps five real architectures against both axes, scored on a concrete retailer workload where stale or slow data breaks the business.
Blog
Personalization is a data-delivery problem. Every architectural choice reduces to two distances: compute to user, and compute to fresh data. This piece maps five real architectures against both axes, scored on a concrete retailer workload where stale or slow data breaks the business.
Person with short dark hair and moustache, wearing a colorful plaid shirt, smiling outdoors in a forested mountain landscape.
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM
Blog

5 Architectures for Web Personalization

Personalization is a data-delivery problem. Every architectural choice reduces to two distances: compute to user, and compute to fresh data. This piece maps five real architectures against both axes, scored on a concrete retailer workload where stale or slow data breaks the business.
Aleks Haugom
Jul 2026
Blog

5 Architectures for Web Personalization

Personalization is a data-delivery problem. Every architectural choice reduces to two distances: compute to user, and compute to fresh data. This piece maps five real architectures against both axes, scored on a concrete retailer workload where stale or slow data breaks the business.
Aleks Haugom
Blog

5 Architectures for Web Personalization

Personalization is a data-delivery problem. Every architectural choice reduces to two distances: compute to user, and compute to fresh data. This piece maps five real architectures against both axes, scored on a concrete retailer workload where stale or slow data breaks the business.
Aleks Haugom
Blog
GitHub Logo

Agentic Engineering Needs an Opinion: Why Scale Starts with Architecture

AI coding works in a sandbox because the environment is trivially narrow. Real systems have history, constraints, and blast radius. Coding agents make sound decisions only when the architecture is explicit and shared. Opinion isn't a constraint on agentic engineering, it's what makes it possible at scale.
Select*
Blog
AI coding works in a sandbox because the environment is trivially narrow. Real systems have history, constraints, and blast radius. Coding agents make sound decisions only when the architecture is explicit and shared. Opinion isn't a constraint on agentic engineering, it's what makes it possible at scale.
A smiling man with a beard and salt-and-pepper hair stands outdoors with arms crossed, wearing a white button-down shirt.
Stephen Goldberg
CEO & Co-Founder
Blog

Agentic Engineering Needs an Opinion: Why Scale Starts with Architecture

AI coding works in a sandbox because the environment is trivially narrow. Real systems have history, constraints, and blast radius. Coding agents make sound decisions only when the architecture is explicit and shared. Opinion isn't a constraint on agentic engineering, it's what makes it possible at scale.
Stephen Goldberg
Jun 2026
Blog

Agentic Engineering Needs an Opinion: Why Scale Starts with Architecture

AI coding works in a sandbox because the environment is trivially narrow. Real systems have history, constraints, and blast radius. Coding agents make sound decisions only when the architecture is explicit and shared. Opinion isn't a constraint on agentic engineering, it's what makes it possible at scale.
Stephen Goldberg
Blog

Agentic Engineering Needs an Opinion: Why Scale Starts with Architecture

AI coding works in a sandbox because the environment is trivially narrow. Real systems have history, constraints, and blast radius. Coding agents make sound decisions only when the architecture is explicit and shared. Opinion isn't a constraint on agentic engineering, it's what makes it possible at scale.
Stephen Goldberg
Blog
GitHub Logo

Building a Cozy Sandbox Game on Harper

A nature-restoration game with six biomes, 150 animals, and a real food web — built with a single Harper component as the entire backend. One YAML file wires the database, API, content seeder, and static host. The same binary ships offline on itch.io.
Shell
Blog
A nature-restoration game with six biomes, 150 animals, and a real food web — built with a single Harper component as the entire backend. One YAML file wires the database, API, content seeder, and static host. The same binary ships offline on itch.io.
Person with long wavy brown hair wearing a bright pink shirt with a teal trim, smiling outdoors in soft sunlight with blurred trees in the background.
Bailey Dunning
Forward Deployed Engineer
Blog

Building a Cozy Sandbox Game on Harper

A nature-restoration game with six biomes, 150 animals, and a real food web — built with a single Harper component as the entire backend. One YAML file wires the database, API, content seeder, and static host. The same binary ships offline on itch.io.
Bailey Dunning
Jun 2026
Blog

Building a Cozy Sandbox Game on Harper

A nature-restoration game with six biomes, 150 animals, and a real food web — built with a single Harper component as the entire backend. One YAML file wires the database, API, content seeder, and static host. The same binary ships offline on itch.io.
Bailey Dunning
Blog

Building a Cozy Sandbox Game on Harper

A nature-restoration game with six biomes, 150 animals, and a real food web — built with a single Harper component as the entire backend. One YAML file wires the database, API, content seeder, and static host. The same binary ships offline on itch.io.
Bailey Dunning
Blog
GitHub Logo

Your Website was Built for Humans. AI Needs Something Cleaner.

The web spent a decade optimizing for browsers. JavaScript-heavy rendering, dynamic CMS templates, and client-side hydration made pages beautiful and machines blind. AI answer engines retrieve, parse, and cite content directly. If your best content is trapped behind a render cycle, a cleaner source wins.
A.I.
Blog
The web spent a decade optimizing for browsers. JavaScript-heavy rendering, dynamic CMS templates, and client-side hydration made pages beautiful and machines blind. AI answer engines retrieve, parse, and cite content directly. If your best content is trapped behind a render cycle, a cleaner source wins.
Person with short dark hair and moustache, wearing a colorful plaid shirt, smiling outdoors in a forested mountain landscape.
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM
Blog

Your Website was Built for Humans. AI Needs Something Cleaner.

The web spent a decade optimizing for browsers. JavaScript-heavy rendering, dynamic CMS templates, and client-side hydration made pages beautiful and machines blind. AI answer engines retrieve, parse, and cite content directly. If your best content is trapped behind a render cycle, a cleaner source wins.
Aleks Haugom
Jun 2026
Blog

Your Website was Built for Humans. AI Needs Something Cleaner.

The web spent a decade optimizing for browsers. JavaScript-heavy rendering, dynamic CMS templates, and client-side hydration made pages beautiful and machines blind. AI answer engines retrieve, parse, and cite content directly. If your best content is trapped behind a render cycle, a cleaner source wins.
Aleks Haugom
Blog

Your Website was Built for Humans. AI Needs Something Cleaner.

The web spent a decade optimizing for browsers. JavaScript-heavy rendering, dynamic CMS templates, and client-side hydration made pages beautiful and machines blind. AI answer engines retrieve, parse, and cite content directly. If your best content is trapped behind a render cycle, a cleaner source wins.
Aleks Haugom