Click Below to Get the Code

Browse, clone, and build from real-world templates powered by Harper.
Blog
GitHub Logo

Scale, Proximity, and Integration: Cracking the Latency Code

Reducing latency for “snappy responses” requires scaling infrastructure to handle high traffic, placing data closer to users with caching and replication, and minimizing interdependencies between components. Fully integrated systems like Harper unify database, caching, and application layers, reducing inefficiencies and ensuring low-latency performance at scale.
Blog

Scale, Proximity, and Integration: Cracking the Latency Code

By
Vince Berk
November 19, 2024
By
Vince Berk
November 19, 2024
By
Vince Berk
November 19, 2024
November 19, 2024
Reducing latency for “snappy responses” requires scaling infrastructure to handle high traffic, placing data closer to users with caching and replication, and minimizing interdependencies between components. Fully integrated systems like Harper unify database, caching, and application layers, reducing inefficiencies and ensuring low-latency performance at scale.
Vince Berk
Board Member

Regarding web performance, "snappy responses" are the goal. In technical terms, this boils down to reducing latency—the time it takes from when a user makes a request to when they receive a response. While it sounds simple, keeping latency low is anything but. Achieving this requires understanding and optimizing a complex web of interdependent systems. Let’s break down the key challenges and strategies for developers looking to master latency management.

The Challenge of Scale: Requests at High Volume

Handling a single request on a single server is straightforward. Most web applications can process this efficiently with minimal delay. However, bottlenecks emerge when you scale to thousands or even millions of users.

High traffic introduces queuing delays as your system becomes overwhelmed. The solution? Parallelization. Web requests are naturally independent and can be distributed across multiple instances or servers. Scaling horizontally—adding more instances to handle the load—is essential to maintaining responsiveness.

Think of this like lanes on a highway: one lane may suffice for light traffic, but additional lanes keep cars moving during rush hour. Similarly, with web applications, the proper infrastructure prevents backups and keeps volume-driven latency in check.

The Geography of Data: Proximity Matters

However, latency isn’t just about server performance—it’s also about distance. Every millisecond counts when data must travel across continents to fulfill a user’s request.  And although data may travel at the speed of light in a fiber optic cable, those cables are of limited length: crossing the globe may mean touching dozens of routers, or “hops” in the middle.  And each routing step adds milliseconds.

This is why edge computing has gained traction. The round-trip time for requests can be significantly reduced by deploying application instances closer to the user. However, running edge instances alone isn’t enough if the data a user needs still resides in a centralized database on the other side of the world.

The solution is caching and replication. Critical data must be strategically copied and placed near where it will be needed. This ensures that there is no long-distance data retrieval. Careful planning is required to determine which data to cache and how to replicate it. Balancing consistency, storage costs, and update strategies is where the art of latency management comes into play.

Breaking the Latency Chain: Tackling Interdependencies

The third and most intricate contributor to latency lies in the interplay between distributed components and the delays introduced by interdependencies. Any time one component must wait for another—whether it’s a query waiting for a database or an application waiting for a downstream service—latency balloons.

Take database queries, for example. A poorly optimized query that evaluates every row in a table can take orders of magnitude longer than one that uses an appropriate index. Similarly, fragmented application architectures often require multiple round-trips between independent services, adding unnecessary delays.

This is where fully integrated systems like Harper can make a big difference. By combining database, caching, application logic, and messaging layers into a unified architecture, Harper eliminates many of these latency-inducing inefficiencies. Instances can be placed very close to the end users in a large constellation, minimizing the distance the data needs to travel for each request, no matter where it originates.  The result? Fewer "middlemen" in the request-to-response pipeline and a direct reduction in latency.

Final Thoughts

Low latency doesn’t happen by accident—it’s the result of deliberate choices at every layer of your stack. From scaling to meet user demand, to strategically placing data and optimizing communication between components, every decision impacts performance.

As developers, we’re tasked with building systems that deliver snappy, reliable responses no matter the conditions. Understanding and addressing these core latency challenges is your first step toward mastering performance through pipelining.

Let’s make the web fast, one request at a time.

Regarding web performance, "snappy responses" are the goal. In technical terms, this boils down to reducing latency—the time it takes from when a user makes a request to when they receive a response. While it sounds simple, keeping latency low is anything but. Achieving this requires understanding and optimizing a complex web of interdependent systems. Let’s break down the key challenges and strategies for developers looking to master latency management.

The Challenge of Scale: Requests at High Volume

Handling a single request on a single server is straightforward. Most web applications can process this efficiently with minimal delay. However, bottlenecks emerge when you scale to thousands or even millions of users.

High traffic introduces queuing delays as your system becomes overwhelmed. The solution? Parallelization. Web requests are naturally independent and can be distributed across multiple instances or servers. Scaling horizontally—adding more instances to handle the load—is essential to maintaining responsiveness.

Think of this like lanes on a highway: one lane may suffice for light traffic, but additional lanes keep cars moving during rush hour. Similarly, with web applications, the proper infrastructure prevents backups and keeps volume-driven latency in check.

The Geography of Data: Proximity Matters

However, latency isn’t just about server performance—it’s also about distance. Every millisecond counts when data must travel across continents to fulfill a user’s request.  And although data may travel at the speed of light in a fiber optic cable, those cables are of limited length: crossing the globe may mean touching dozens of routers, or “hops” in the middle.  And each routing step adds milliseconds.

This is why edge computing has gained traction. The round-trip time for requests can be significantly reduced by deploying application instances closer to the user. However, running edge instances alone isn’t enough if the data a user needs still resides in a centralized database on the other side of the world.

The solution is caching and replication. Critical data must be strategically copied and placed near where it will be needed. This ensures that there is no long-distance data retrieval. Careful planning is required to determine which data to cache and how to replicate it. Balancing consistency, storage costs, and update strategies is where the art of latency management comes into play.

Breaking the Latency Chain: Tackling Interdependencies

The third and most intricate contributor to latency lies in the interplay between distributed components and the delays introduced by interdependencies. Any time one component must wait for another—whether it’s a query waiting for a database or an application waiting for a downstream service—latency balloons.

Take database queries, for example. A poorly optimized query that evaluates every row in a table can take orders of magnitude longer than one that uses an appropriate index. Similarly, fragmented application architectures often require multiple round-trips between independent services, adding unnecessary delays.

This is where fully integrated systems like Harper can make a big difference. By combining database, caching, application logic, and messaging layers into a unified architecture, Harper eliminates many of these latency-inducing inefficiencies. Instances can be placed very close to the end users in a large constellation, minimizing the distance the data needs to travel for each request, no matter where it originates.  The result? Fewer "middlemen" in the request-to-response pipeline and a direct reduction in latency.

Final Thoughts

Low latency doesn’t happen by accident—it’s the result of deliberate choices at every layer of your stack. From scaling to meet user demand, to strategically placing data and optimizing communication between components, every decision impacts performance.

As developers, we’re tasked with building systems that deliver snappy, reliable responses no matter the conditions. Understanding and addressing these core latency challenges is your first step toward mastering performance through pipelining.

Let’s make the web fast, one request at a time.

Reducing latency for “snappy responses” requires scaling infrastructure to handle high traffic, placing data closer to users with caching and replication, and minimizing interdependencies between components. Fully integrated systems like Harper unify database, caching, and application layers, reducing inefficiencies and ensuring low-latency performance at scale.

Download

White arrow pointing right
Reducing latency for “snappy responses” requires scaling infrastructure to handle high traffic, placing data closer to users with caching and replication, and minimizing interdependencies between components. Fully integrated systems like Harper unify database, caching, and application layers, reducing inefficiencies and ensuring low-latency performance at scale.

Download

White arrow pointing right
Reducing latency for “snappy responses” requires scaling infrastructure to handle high traffic, placing data closer to users with caching and replication, and minimizing interdependencies between components. Fully integrated systems like Harper unify database, caching, and application layers, reducing inefficiencies and ensuring low-latency performance at scale.

Download

White arrow pointing right

Explore Recent Resources

Blog
GitHub Logo

Why a Multi-Tier Cache Delivers Better ROI Than a CDN Alone

Learn why a multi-tier caching strategy combining a CDN and mid-tier cache delivers better ROI. Discover how deterministic caching, improved origin offload, lower tail latency, and predictable costs outperform a CDN-only architecture for modern applications.
Cache
Blog
Learn why a multi-tier caching strategy combining a CDN and mid-tier cache delivers better ROI. Discover how deterministic caching, improved origin offload, lower tail latency, and predictable costs outperform a CDN-only architecture for modern applications.
Person with short dark hair and moustache, wearing a colorful plaid shirt, smiling outdoors in a forested mountain landscape.
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM & Marketing
Blog

Why a Multi-Tier Cache Delivers Better ROI Than a CDN Alone

Learn why a multi-tier caching strategy combining a CDN and mid-tier cache delivers better ROI. Discover how deterministic caching, improved origin offload, lower tail latency, and predictable costs outperform a CDN-only architecture for modern applications.
Aleks Haugom
Jan 2026
Blog

Why a Multi-Tier Cache Delivers Better ROI Than a CDN Alone

Learn why a multi-tier caching strategy combining a CDN and mid-tier cache delivers better ROI. Discover how deterministic caching, improved origin offload, lower tail latency, and predictable costs outperform a CDN-only architecture for modern applications.
Aleks Haugom
Blog

Why a Multi-Tier Cache Delivers Better ROI Than a CDN Alone

Learn why a multi-tier caching strategy combining a CDN and mid-tier cache delivers better ROI. Discover how deterministic caching, improved origin offload, lower tail latency, and predictable costs outperform a CDN-only architecture for modern applications.
Aleks Haugom
Tutorial
GitHub Logo

Real-Time Pub/Sub Without the "Stack"

Explore a real-time pub/sub architecture where MQTT, WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, and REST work together with persistent data storage in one end-to-end system, enabling real-time interoperability, stateful messaging, and simplified service-to-device and browser communication.
Harper Learn
Tutorial
Explore a real-time pub/sub architecture where MQTT, WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, and REST work together with persistent data storage in one end-to-end system, enabling real-time interoperability, stateful messaging, and simplified service-to-device and browser communication.
A man with short dark hair, glasses, and a goatee smiles slightly, wearing a black shirt in front of a nature background.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Distinguished Solution Architect
Tutorial

Real-Time Pub/Sub Without the "Stack"

Explore a real-time pub/sub architecture where MQTT, WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, and REST work together with persistent data storage in one end-to-end system, enabling real-time interoperability, stateful messaging, and simplified service-to-device and browser communication.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Jan 2026
Tutorial

Real-Time Pub/Sub Without the "Stack"

Explore a real-time pub/sub architecture where MQTT, WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, and REST work together with persistent data storage in one end-to-end system, enabling real-time interoperability, stateful messaging, and simplified service-to-device and browser communication.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Tutorial

Real-Time Pub/Sub Without the "Stack"

Explore a real-time pub/sub architecture where MQTT, WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, and REST work together with persistent data storage in one end-to-end system, enabling real-time interoperability, stateful messaging, and simplified service-to-device and browser communication.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
News
GitHub Logo

Harper Recognized on Built In’s 2026 Best Places to Work in Colorado Lists

Harper is honored as a Built In 2026 Best Startup to Work For and Best Place to Work in Colorado, recognizing its people-first culture, strong employee experience, and values of accountability, authenticity, empowerment, focus, and transparency that help teams thrive and grow together.
Announcement
News
Harper is honored as a Built In 2026 Best Startup to Work For and Best Place to Work in Colorado, recognizing its people-first culture, strong employee experience, and values of accountability, authenticity, empowerment, focus, and transparency that help teams thrive and grow together.
Colorful geometric illustration of a dog's head resembling folded paper art in shades of teal and pink.
Harper
News

Harper Recognized on Built In’s 2026 Best Places to Work in Colorado Lists

Harper is honored as a Built In 2026 Best Startup to Work For and Best Place to Work in Colorado, recognizing its people-first culture, strong employee experience, and values of accountability, authenticity, empowerment, focus, and transparency that help teams thrive and grow together.
Harper
Jan 2026
News

Harper Recognized on Built In’s 2026 Best Places to Work in Colorado Lists

Harper is honored as a Built In 2026 Best Startup to Work For and Best Place to Work in Colorado, recognizing its people-first culture, strong employee experience, and values of accountability, authenticity, empowerment, focus, and transparency that help teams thrive and grow together.
Harper
News

Harper Recognized on Built In’s 2026 Best Places to Work in Colorado Lists

Harper is honored as a Built In 2026 Best Startup to Work For and Best Place to Work in Colorado, recognizing its people-first culture, strong employee experience, and values of accountability, authenticity, empowerment, focus, and transparency that help teams thrive and grow together.
Harper
Comparison
GitHub Logo

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Comparison
A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Person with short dark hair and moustache, wearing a colorful plaid shirt, smiling outdoors in a forested mountain landscape.
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM & Marketing
Comparison

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Aleks Haugom
Dec 2025
Comparison

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Aleks Haugom
Comparison

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Aleks Haugom
Tutorial
GitHub Logo

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Harper Learn
Tutorial
Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
A man with short dark hair, glasses, and a goatee smiles slightly, wearing a black shirt in front of a nature background.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Distinguished Solution Architect
Tutorial

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Dec 2025
Tutorial

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Tutorial

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.