Click Below to Get the Code

Browse, clone, and build from real-world templates powered by Harper.
Tutorial
GitHub Logo

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Harper Learn
Tutorial
Harper Learn

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

By
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
December 19, 2025
By
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
December 19, 2025
By
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
December 19, 2025
December 19, 2025
Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Distinguished Solution Architect

👉 Follow along with the code: https://github.com/HarperFast/mqtt-getting-started


If you want to run everything you see in the video yourself, start with the repository above. It contains a working example of Harper acting as a real-time backbone—brokering MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events, while also persisting data in one place.

This post is here to answer a slightly bigger question:

Why would you want to build something like this in the first place?

Problem: Real-Time Is Fragmented

Most real-world systems don’t use just one real-time protocol.

You might have:

  • Devices publishing telemetry over MQTT
  • Browsers consuming live updates over WebSockets
  • Dashboards or services subscribing via HTTP events
  • Applications that need the data stored for querying, replay, or recovery

Traditionally, these concerns get split apart:

  • A broker handles MQTT
  • A database stores the data
  • A separate service fans events out to clients
  • More glue connects everything together

Each piece works—but the system becomes harder to reason about, harder to scale, and harder to change.

What we’re exploring here is a simpler model:
one runtime that handles messaging, fan-out, and persistence together.

What Harper Is Doing Differently

In this setup, Harper sits in the middle as a real-time backbone, not just a message broker.

That means:

  • MQTT clients can publish and subscribe directly to Harper
  • WebSocket clients can publish and subscribe to the same resources
  • Server-Sent Events clients can subscribe over plain HTTP
  • Messages are persisted automatically as structured data
  • Every protocol sees the same events, in real time

There’s no translation layer and no external sync process. Once a message arrives, it’s immediately usable everywhere.

Getting Started: Minimal Setup, Real Results

Most of this works with almost no configuration.

In config.yml, enabling REST is enough:

rest: true


This turns on:

  • WebSocket support
  • Server-Sent Events
  • Resource-based pub/sub

MQTT support is already enabled by default.

From there, we define a couple of tables in schema.graphql:

type topics @export {
  id: ID!
}

type sensors {
  id: ID!
  location: String
  temperature: Float
}

The exported topics table enables wildcard subscriptions, while sensors gives us a place to persist incoming telemetry.

This is important: messages aren’t ephemeral. They’re stored, queryable, and replayable.

Publish Once, Use Everywhere

An MQTT publisher sends sensor data:

{
  "id": "sensor-101",
  "location": "lab",
  "temperature": 97.2
}

That single publish:

  • Updates the sensors table
  • Notifies MQTT subscribers
  • Pushes updates to WebSocket clients
  • Streams events to Server-Sent Events clients

For example, a WebSocket client can subscribe with:

ws://localhost:9926/sensors/sensor-101

And an SSE client uses the same resource over HTTP:

http://localhost:9926/sensors/sensor-101

Same data. Same topic. Different protocols.

Why This Matters in Practice

This pattern shows up in a lot of real systems:

  • IoT and edge telemetry, where devices publish over MQTT but humans consume data in browsers
  • Operational dashboards, where live data and historical data must stay in sync
  • Event-driven applications, where services need both real-time notifications and durable state
  • Distributed systems, where reducing moving parts directly improves reliability

By collapsing messaging, storage, and fan-out into one runtime, Harper makes these systems easier to build and easier to operate.

You spend less time wiring infrastructure together—and more time building the application logic that actually matters.

What Comes Next

In the next step (and the next video), we build an application that listens to these table-level events directly inside Harper. That’s where this turns from “broker demo” into a full event-driven application model.

Until then, clone the repo, run it locally, and watch the data flow.

Take a breath. Grab a cup of tea.
And enjoy building simpler real-time systems

👉 Follow along with the code: https://github.com/HarperFast/mqtt-getting-started


If you want to run everything you see in the video yourself, start with the repository above. It contains a working example of Harper acting as a real-time backbone—brokering MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events, while also persisting data in one place.

This post is here to answer a slightly bigger question:

Why would you want to build something like this in the first place?

Problem: Real-Time Is Fragmented

Most real-world systems don’t use just one real-time protocol.

You might have:

  • Devices publishing telemetry over MQTT
  • Browsers consuming live updates over WebSockets
  • Dashboards or services subscribing via HTTP events
  • Applications that need the data stored for querying, replay, or recovery

Traditionally, these concerns get split apart:

  • A broker handles MQTT
  • A database stores the data
  • A separate service fans events out to clients
  • More glue connects everything together

Each piece works—but the system becomes harder to reason about, harder to scale, and harder to change.

What we’re exploring here is a simpler model:
one runtime that handles messaging, fan-out, and persistence together.

What Harper Is Doing Differently

In this setup, Harper sits in the middle as a real-time backbone, not just a message broker.

That means:

  • MQTT clients can publish and subscribe directly to Harper
  • WebSocket clients can publish and subscribe to the same resources
  • Server-Sent Events clients can subscribe over plain HTTP
  • Messages are persisted automatically as structured data
  • Every protocol sees the same events, in real time

There’s no translation layer and no external sync process. Once a message arrives, it’s immediately usable everywhere.

Getting Started: Minimal Setup, Real Results

Most of this works with almost no configuration.

In config.yml, enabling REST is enough:

rest: true


This turns on:

  • WebSocket support
  • Server-Sent Events
  • Resource-based pub/sub

MQTT support is already enabled by default.

From there, we define a couple of tables in schema.graphql:

type topics @export {
  id: ID!
}

type sensors {
  id: ID!
  location: String
  temperature: Float
}

The exported topics table enables wildcard subscriptions, while sensors gives us a place to persist incoming telemetry.

This is important: messages aren’t ephemeral. They’re stored, queryable, and replayable.

Publish Once, Use Everywhere

An MQTT publisher sends sensor data:

{
  "id": "sensor-101",
  "location": "lab",
  "temperature": 97.2
}

That single publish:

  • Updates the sensors table
  • Notifies MQTT subscribers
  • Pushes updates to WebSocket clients
  • Streams events to Server-Sent Events clients

For example, a WebSocket client can subscribe with:

ws://localhost:9926/sensors/sensor-101

And an SSE client uses the same resource over HTTP:

http://localhost:9926/sensors/sensor-101

Same data. Same topic. Different protocols.

Why This Matters in Practice

This pattern shows up in a lot of real systems:

  • IoT and edge telemetry, where devices publish over MQTT but humans consume data in browsers
  • Operational dashboards, where live data and historical data must stay in sync
  • Event-driven applications, where services need both real-time notifications and durable state
  • Distributed systems, where reducing moving parts directly improves reliability

By collapsing messaging, storage, and fan-out into one runtime, Harper makes these systems easier to build and easier to operate.

You spend less time wiring infrastructure together—and more time building the application logic that actually matters.

What Comes Next

In the next step (and the next video), we build an application that listens to these table-level events directly inside Harper. That’s where this turns from “broker demo” into a full event-driven application model.

Until then, clone the repo, run it locally, and watch the data flow.

Take a breath. Grab a cup of tea.
And enjoy building simpler real-time systems

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.

Download

White arrow pointing right
Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.

Download

White arrow pointing right
Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.

Download

White arrow pointing right

Explore Recent Resources

Comparison
GitHub Logo

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Comparison
A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Person with short dark hair and moustache, wearing a colorful plaid shirt, smiling outdoors in a forested mountain landscape.
Aleks Haugom
Senior Manager of GTM & Marketing
Comparison

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Aleks Haugom
Dec 2025
Comparison

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Aleks Haugom
Comparison

Harper vs. Standard Microservices: Performance Comparison Benchmark

A detailed performance benchmark comparing a traditional microservices architecture with Harper’s unified runtime. Using a real, fully functional e-commerce application, this report examines latency, scalability, and architectural overhead across homepage, category, and product pages, highlighting the real-world performance implications between two different styles of distributed systems.
Aleks Haugom
Tutorial
GitHub Logo

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Harper Learn
Tutorial
Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
A man with short dark hair, glasses, and a goatee smiles slightly, wearing a black shirt in front of a nature background.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Distinguished Solution Architect
Tutorial

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Dec 2025
Tutorial

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Tutorial

A Simpler Real-Time Messaging Architecture with MQTT, WebSockets, and SSE

Learn how to build a unified real-time backbone using Harper with MQTT, WebSockets, and Server-Sent Events. This guide shows how to broker messages, fan out real-time data, and persist events in one runtime—simplifying real-time system architecture for IoT, dashboards, and event-driven applications.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Podcast
GitHub Logo

Turn Browsing into Buying with Edge AI

Discover how Harper’s latest features streamline development, boost performance, and simplify integration. This technical showcase breaks down real-world workflows, powerful updates, and practical tips for building faster, smarter applications.
Select*
Podcast
Discover how Harper’s latest features streamline development, boost performance, and simplify integration. This technical showcase breaks down real-world workflows, powerful updates, and practical tips for building faster, smarter applications.
Person with short hair wearing a light blue patterned shirt, smiling widely outdoors with blurred greenery and trees in the background.
Austin Akers
Head of Developer Relations
Podcast

Turn Browsing into Buying with Edge AI

Discover how Harper’s latest features streamline development, boost performance, and simplify integration. This technical showcase breaks down real-world workflows, powerful updates, and practical tips for building faster, smarter applications.
Austin Akers
Dec 2025
Podcast

Turn Browsing into Buying with Edge AI

Discover how Harper’s latest features streamline development, boost performance, and simplify integration. This technical showcase breaks down real-world workflows, powerful updates, and practical tips for building faster, smarter applications.
Austin Akers
Podcast

Turn Browsing into Buying with Edge AI

Discover how Harper’s latest features streamline development, boost performance, and simplify integration. This technical showcase breaks down real-world workflows, powerful updates, and practical tips for building faster, smarter applications.
Austin Akers
Tutorial
GitHub Logo

The Easiest Way to Use MQTT: A Hands-On Demo with Harper’s Built-In Broker

Learn how MQTT works and see a real-time demo using Harper’s built-in MQTT broker. Discover topics, Pub/Sub, QoS, retained messages, and how Harper simplifies IoT and edge data workflows. Watch how to publish, subscribe, and store sensor data instantly with an easy, developer-friendly setup.
Harper Learn
Tutorial
Learn how MQTT works and see a real-time demo using Harper’s built-in MQTT broker. Discover topics, Pub/Sub, QoS, retained messages, and how Harper simplifies IoT and edge data workflows. Watch how to publish, subscribe, and store sensor data instantly with an easy, developer-friendly setup.
A man with short dark hair, glasses, and a goatee smiles slightly, wearing a black shirt in front of a nature background.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Distinguished Solution Architect
Tutorial

The Easiest Way to Use MQTT: A Hands-On Demo with Harper’s Built-In Broker

Learn how MQTT works and see a real-time demo using Harper’s built-in MQTT broker. Discover topics, Pub/Sub, QoS, retained messages, and how Harper simplifies IoT and edge data workflows. Watch how to publish, subscribe, and store sensor data instantly with an easy, developer-friendly setup.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Dec 2025
Tutorial

The Easiest Way to Use MQTT: A Hands-On Demo with Harper’s Built-In Broker

Learn how MQTT works and see a real-time demo using Harper’s built-in MQTT broker. Discover topics, Pub/Sub, QoS, retained messages, and how Harper simplifies IoT and edge data workflows. Watch how to publish, subscribe, and store sensor data instantly with an easy, developer-friendly setup.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Tutorial

The Easiest Way to Use MQTT: A Hands-On Demo with Harper’s Built-In Broker

Learn how MQTT works and see a real-time demo using Harper’s built-in MQTT broker. Discover topics, Pub/Sub, QoS, retained messages, and how Harper simplifies IoT and edge data workflows. Watch how to publish, subscribe, and store sensor data instantly with an easy, developer-friendly setup.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Comparison
GitHub Logo

Harper vs. AWS IoT Core: Why Unified Architectures Win for Real-Time Systems

Harper’s unified application platform fuses MQTT, database storage, and real-time logic into one high-performance runtime—eliminating AWS service sprawl, IAM complexity, and Lambda overhead. For real-time systems, Harper delivers simpler architectures, lower latency, reduced costs, and faster developer velocity compared to fragmented AWS IoT Core solutions.
Comparison
Harper’s unified application platform fuses MQTT, database storage, and real-time logic into one high-performance runtime—eliminating AWS service sprawl, IAM complexity, and Lambda overhead. For real-time systems, Harper delivers simpler architectures, lower latency, reduced costs, and faster developer velocity compared to fragmented AWS IoT Core solutions.
A man with short dark hair, glasses, and a goatee smiles slightly, wearing a black shirt in front of a nature background.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Distinguished Solution Architect
Comparison

Harper vs. AWS IoT Core: Why Unified Architectures Win for Real-Time Systems

Harper’s unified application platform fuses MQTT, database storage, and real-time logic into one high-performance runtime—eliminating AWS service sprawl, IAM complexity, and Lambda overhead. For real-time systems, Harper delivers simpler architectures, lower latency, reduced costs, and faster developer velocity compared to fragmented AWS IoT Core solutions.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Dec 2025
Comparison

Harper vs. AWS IoT Core: Why Unified Architectures Win for Real-Time Systems

Harper’s unified application platform fuses MQTT, database storage, and real-time logic into one high-performance runtime—eliminating AWS service sprawl, IAM complexity, and Lambda overhead. For real-time systems, Harper delivers simpler architectures, lower latency, reduced costs, and faster developer velocity compared to fragmented AWS IoT Core solutions.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.
Comparison

Harper vs. AWS IoT Core: Why Unified Architectures Win for Real-Time Systems

Harper’s unified application platform fuses MQTT, database storage, and real-time logic into one high-performance runtime—eliminating AWS service sprawl, IAM complexity, and Lambda overhead. For real-time systems, Harper delivers simpler architectures, lower latency, reduced costs, and faster developer velocity compared to fragmented AWS IoT Core solutions.
Ivan R. Judson, Ph.D.